He deserved a good mauling
There's a story of another bear attack in yesterday's Ottawa Citizen (picked up from the Calgary [Alberta] Herald). For reasons I will point out in a moment, I found the story amusing. The first sentence reads:
- A Quebec man who camped illegally in a closed section of Banff National Park escaped with minor injuries after a nose-to-nose encounter with a mother grizzly bear, frustrating park wardens who say the man's actions put the lives of the bear and her newborn cubs at risk.
So why am I amused? Look closely at that first sentence: "A Quebec man … escaped with minor injuries … frustrating park wardens."
The wardens think he deserved a good mauling, I guess.
1 Comments:
Unfortunately stupidity isn't a crime, neither the stupidity of camping illegally in a closed section of a park nor poor grammar.
I think the nip sufficed, we should reserve the mauling for bear poachers.
Post a Comment
<< Home